Oh, Jesus.
Nov. 5th, 2004 05:07 pmWooo! I got a USPS click-n-ship. Considering it's too early to get my 10/8 order, I'mm assuming my 9/22 is finally on the way! Combine this with two trader order and
belladonnastrap's generosity, I will have an incredibly BPAL-eriffic week!
And for something less airheaded::
Via
iamjackshate and CNN::
Machine Error Gives Bush Extra Ohio Votes.
Exerpted::
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) - An error with an electronic voting system gave President Bush 3,893 extra votes in suburban Columbus, elections officials said.
Franklin County's unofficial results had Bush receiving 4,258 votes to Democrat John Kerry's 260 votes in a precinct in Gahanna. Records show only 638 voters cast ballots in that precinct.
The Secretary of State's Office said Friday it could not revise Bush's total until the county reported the error.
Yes, and considering Ohio's officials are so fucking committed to fairness, that's certainly likely to happen soon. And it goes on...
In one North Carolina county, more than 4,500 votes were lost because officials mistakenly believed a computer that stored ballots electronically could hold more data than it did. And in San Francisco, a malfunction with custom voting software could delay efforts to declare the winners of four races for county supervisor.
In the Ohio precinct in question, the votes are recorded onto a cartridge. On one of the three machines at that precinct, a malfunction occurred in the recording process, Damschroder said. He could not explain how the malfunction occurred.
The corruption in this country makes me sick. The bigotry this country approves of makes me sick. I've never been a particularly political person, but this is a wake up call for me. I need to get involved.
ETA::
jae_ has an awesome comparison map in his latest entry. Check it out.
And for something less airheaded::
Via
Machine Error Gives Bush Extra Ohio Votes.
Exerpted::
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) - An error with an electronic voting system gave President Bush 3,893 extra votes in suburban Columbus, elections officials said.
Franklin County's unofficial results had Bush receiving 4,258 votes to Democrat John Kerry's 260 votes in a precinct in Gahanna. Records show only 638 voters cast ballots in that precinct.
The Secretary of State's Office said Friday it could not revise Bush's total until the county reported the error.
Yes, and considering Ohio's officials are so fucking committed to fairness, that's certainly likely to happen soon. And it goes on...
In one North Carolina county, more than 4,500 votes were lost because officials mistakenly believed a computer that stored ballots electronically could hold more data than it did. And in San Francisco, a malfunction with custom voting software could delay efforts to declare the winners of four races for county supervisor.
In the Ohio precinct in question, the votes are recorded onto a cartridge. On one of the three machines at that precinct, a malfunction occurred in the recording process, Damschroder said. He could not explain how the malfunction occurred.
The corruption in this country makes me sick. The bigotry this country approves of makes me sick. I've never been a particularly political person, but this is a wake up call for me. I need to get involved.
ETA::
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 02:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 02:35 pm (UTC)They're not going to be able to determine it. The people running the election were highly partisan and denied neutral election monitors the right to step in and keep a watch. It was fixed from the get-go. Not only that, but GOP
assholes"poll watchers"bulliedcontested so many (mostly black) voters into nearly worthless provisional ballots because no one knew what their voting rights were. So:1) there were significant electronic poll mistakes
2) absentee ballots have not been tabulated
3) tons of provisional ballots were thrown out.
Way to fucking go, Ohio.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 05:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-06 07:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 02:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 04:43 pm (UTC)Also, at one precinct, the power went out because the weather was kind of ick. Poll officials and voters got together and found flashlights and pulled up their cars with headlights on so people could see. They didn't want there to be any mistakes.
And one county had a major problem because one of the local candidates decided that day to pull out of the race. So they had to deal with a lot of write-ins which complicated the counting of the ballets.
There's other examples besides these. Being local, I hear the good things on the news as well as the bad. I think that Ohio is getting painted in a very bad light nationally because only the bad is focused on.
Of course, I'm not objecting that there was some wrong doing at certain precincts (because where politics are involved, there's almost always corruption), but definitely not in the majority.
Please take no offense to my comment. I just wanted to let you know that not all of Ohio has "bad voting" policies. And hey, my county actually had more votes for Kerry rather than Bush.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 06:55 pm (UTC)and their unwillingness to be committed to tabulating all the ballots before declaring a winner in such a crucial race.
Ohio has 11 days to count and verify the provisional ballets. Stuff about the provisional ballets has been going on for months, and they never did come to a clear decision on them. Idiots.
And you want to know what probably helped Bush to win Ohio? The Amish vote. There's around 50,000 and they don't always vote. But Bush went and spoke to them. There's no way they'd vote for a liberal. I'm not sure how many actually voted, but it probably helped him some.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 06:49 pm (UTC)Next they'll be back to burning witches...
no subject
Date: 2004-11-05 09:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-06 01:33 am (UTC)In all fairness, the company that produced the machine in question admitted (according to quotes from my morning newspaper, anyway) that they provided incorrect information. They said the machine would hold something like 10,500 votes. In actuality, its capacity was a mightily arbitrary 3,005 votes. The county used the machine for early voting; they projected a turnout of under 10,500 votes by an appreciable margin, so decided to procure only one of the machines.